Retour sur EthCC2 @TalanLabs 27/03/2019

So thank you all for coming for this, for these fragments of being here, which will be done not only by me but by several members of the CET. I actually started by telling you a little about the CET who has already come to me, about the CET who is a member of the CET who paid their 2019 dues, so I invite everyone else to do so. But anyway, everyone knows about May 7th, our goal is to promote the auto technology, Ron and Hermione, sorry, and also and especially to bring the community together around these technologies. So we've been doing this since 2015, we organize monthly meetups and we also organize Let's Here, which we're talking about tonight. We've had everything, we have social networks on which you can follow us, we invite you to do so, it helps us a lot.

And so, you can support us by joining, it's only 10 euros, it gives you access to the bag and therefore to all sorts of information in advance. So this year we organized this conference which is ugly 6 6 who was at the help if So, it was really great, okay, so this was the second edition of the conference, and this is the third year we've organized a conference of this scale. This year, we had six years of parallel events, and we had over 1100 participants, 200 students, and 250 speakers from 50 different countries. Given the numbers, we can say we've almost doubled this year, so we were quite happy. We were able to do this thanks to sponsors and ticket sales, but especially thanks to the sponsors.

We invited over 130 students for free, mainly from abroad. We had 70 authors who helped us do all this, and we initiated the Enrique White Community Movement, which took place throughout the week. Around 30 events were held here, so it was really nice. There were quite a few activities around them. Here in Uracaton, there were several events.

I talk about it every night, so there were quite a few activities. So tonight, the debrief... will be done by four of our members - including, and we'll try to cover, not exhaustively, but a bit of the different tracks that have taken place. So, you see, we've had a number to mention, notably 0 for any hero that was done, on the other hand, 106, which isn't a theme in itself but had several themes, well, there were several tracts like that, so 3.0, which was done by Nation 3.

0, and otherwise, we aggregated, we tried to put the talks into these broad categories, but we managed, well, it was difficult to define the tracks under a category, they overlap, and often we had this year, so more than 250 talks under 15 tracts, and here I've highlighted the five most popular tracks where there were the most talks, which are, for me, quite representative of this year's trends, so where there are quite a few applications that went into production, so we had quite a lot of stuff on the stage, again, it's not significant in the sense that there were a lot of fantasies. Overlapping each time, so often the tox fall into several categories, but I find that this is still significant of one of the two trends. So, always with decentralized applications going into production, 40 in total, and in any case, we have applications we can try today. We'll talk about some of them during this talk. Decentralized finance, which was one of the major themes this year, but also, always themes like luxury scalability and then tooling, always recurring themes.

Many said that we were talking a lot about cases, even more so than this year. In 2018, scalability and climate in 2019 were still a main theme, with, in addition, applications that we could try. So I say that 2019 and 2018, then Sprott, well, it's half true, but there you go. And we're going to get to the heart of the matter. So, we're going to review, as I said, in a non-exhaustive way, a few things that we, as members, have been able to see, with the idea of ​​giving you a little An overview of what was said, and then potentially make you want to go watch the videos, which are all accessible online.

It's true that I didn't say all the videos were recorded, so we have a lot of content on our YouTube channels. You can go watch all the videos online. So that was a lot of work. Well, I started with the Gimme hunt, so it wasn't the most represented hunt in terms of views, it was the least represented hunt, but that doesn't mean these texts aren't interesting. On the contrary, I found that the discussions were quite representative of the ecosystem in that they gave a good overview of what's happening in the gaming world.

On the right channel, there were three talks, and in this hunt, which followed the first one by Mathias Neeson from Experimental, they were all full of [ __ ] and App Wizard of the Review. Young Noah here at Experimental, so it's the company behind Crypto Wars, a game you might have tried. Who has tried Crypto Wars? Okay, there are two of us, really. Okay, so It's not that widely discussed, but it was a game that was a bit of a hit, quite funny, launched in 2018.

So, it was this guy, Tall, who gave us a bit of a history of their game. And through their story, we revisited the different eras of the crypto market. They told us that in 2017, they were offered two million for a landing page, which they refused because they thought it was too low. In 2018, they really struggled to raise 500,000 dollars. So, we reviewed it a bit.

They launched in 2018, and the history... well, we laughed. They launched in 2018 and had three thousand users in the first week, which is a lot for a game in the crypto world. They were hungry for success. They told us that in 2018, the main problem they faced was scalability.

Culture is a game that runs on Loup, so in this match, it was n't so much stability that was the problem for them, even though there were some technical difficulties during the tournaments, but rather usability, meaning how users interact with the game. We don't necessarily see the slightly annoying aspects of the object, and then he presented us with figures on the gaming market in Blue Jays that I found interesting. He talked about 20,000 monthly users and 126,000 annual users, which is nothing at all, and he even said so himself. So we talk a lot about the fact that gaming is potentially a gateway for the adoption of the blog. Shane himself had doubts about that, in the sense that it's really a niche market and therefore has a lot of work to do on it, particularly through education.

I'll come back to that later. He also mentioned the fact that I had proposed implementing the OS. Their game on their blog, Shane, and he was ready to pay them $150,000. So, we're kind of selling the adoption strategies of iOS developers. They refused, and they dedicated a whole part of their presentation to why they refused.

That's what they were offered to implement the game on... not too much said, but they had several slides that I invite you to go see on why it was a very bad idea, especially because it was decentralized. That's what led them to create this game on a plot of land initially. In any case, decentralizing the second volume that I found interesting was about Marif in the city of the company Be to Explain, which is behind a game called, notably, a game called Beyond the Void. It's a French company, and it's a real shame.

It was released on Steam. I tried it; it's a kind of... who played Beyond the Void and its rate... which... which...

to remind us a little... we leave after... game... during the development of a game... chain blocks...

while putting... That puts it in perspective, in the blood, a state of the art, a bit of the different games that exist on the market today, so it was quite interesting. It's her own definition of blockchain games, and so you see this table there which compares games based on one axis, which deals with the ability to integrate blockchain technologies, and on the other, we have the wealth, rich front-end players, and what she was saying is a bit about years and older and decentralized, average content, basically, so talking about crypto, which teases, so on the far left, so the crypto games which start from the premise that from the moment we implement blockchain, it's notably to process BNF assets, so you're at all sorts of, there are a number of games that do this, so here not on the FT for normal traits since, to stick, to collect things, and then there are different levels, there are different levels of implementation of the next, so aside, the blockchain games, these are rather slower games and like real video games that will add blockchain features, so that's where she was positioning herself, and that's where she was saying—well, she was saying that was the main interest of the next one, according to her—it was more about adding interesting features and potentially interoperability, and there, all credit to Chip, so that's what she knows, what she put at the top right is what she's doing, what she calls the 200 races games, and for her, it's a utopia for the moment, but it's potentially a day when games will have a parent platform and with assets easily transferable between games, and where players will really be able to put their assets on the line, so that's where players will be able to experience blockchain at its highest level, she said, and she talked about some of the challenges that video game developers face, so if we're talking about luxury and, of course, regulatory uncertainty and scaling, the solutions in relation to that were this focus on luxury, but also and especially developing real games So, good games, that's true, it seems obvious, but I think that indeed, we really need to develop good games to encourage adoption. Take boccia, for example. Finally, one last thing, which I won't elaborate on too much, but it's interesting: it's Nicolas Julia, whose company is what you see on my mouse, developing their schedule.

It's a game, a French company, former Strathearn employees, thank you, who are going there and developing an interesting game with DNF, which is sure to be based on card collections of two potentially promising football players. That's just my opinion. Available hours, I'm the one who makes them, and it echoes what the speakers were saying, which is that for me, the future of the Shane Gaming blog will come more from companies and startups, or even video game studios, that implement or add features from the blockchain, rather than startups that are just copycats of the Shane blog and say, "Hey, let's make a game because it's the contribution to blockchain adoption." And it absolutely has to be used by everyone. I think that for games to be fun, they have to be developed by people who know how to develop video games.

So I think it's great that the games that exist today, the crypto teases and all that, are great. But it's true that if we want real games that are truly adopted on a large scale, we're still waiting for the big video game studios that are coming up, that are developing things for, well, a wider adoption of video games. And through video games, the Blood Chain, by the way, there are big studios like Ubisoft working on it, and huge investors like Excuse and Sixtine Henderson Horowitz who invest in games in Motion, who have invested in crypto teases. Was it a good idea? I don't know, but still, they're looking at the sector, and so it's interesting.

And that's the first time I'm here. I'm going to hand over the floor. We're going to change the subject, and Alex is going to talk to you about Myst. Hi, who Does anyone know Mist or have they ever used Mist? So, I was talking about a rate of Philippe Lang in what was titled "Update from the Mist Team," where he spoke about two ministers.

He made three announcements. The first concerns Mist directly. As a reminder, Mist is a wallet and a browser for decentralized applications. It's a graphical interface on top of GET that has been distributed since 2015. So it was really the first graphical tool on top of GET that we could use.

We could deploy smart contracts. In the top right, you manage many accounts, and in the bottom right, you interact with other processes. In the bottom left, you interact with other processes. The news is that Mr. Morts, well, that's it.

What did n't work... So, when he says his name is Philippe, he went back to what didn't work, notably developing a browser with Electron in 2016, which caused them problems. Developing his own alternative to Electron, called La Hassue, also caused problems, and to launch Mist, you automatically had to launch a full... mode and that there is a bad user experience and new users have turned to simple alternative solutions like and to hide in a browser that allowed direct interaction with the blocks. It's not about waiting long for them to be synchronized.

In fact, in 2015 it wasn't so much a problem, but over the years it started to become one, and so the conclusion is that Mist has been useful for years but can no longer exist in this form. There have been two other announcements, notably the launch of HomeGrid terrains, so that's a new alternative to Mist. The idea is to completely rethink the tool and the audience. It will be a multi-client manager that will allow, unlike Dong and Paris, which are tools, so Swarm, they mentioned these three, so it will surely help others. It will be a kind of manager with a kind of grid to have all its clients' tools.

So there is a strong desire for a great developer experience, and apparently, it makes React components available. It was real that people could use, so So, this is all brand new, and there's the third announcement: it was the launch of summer rheum, its in-package, not that it's aimed at. So usually, when we deliver an application or software, we sign the software with certificates, and people who download software can verify the integrity of the software by checking the signature. So the idea is to do the same thing, to offer package signing mechanisms, but one that uses cryptography, which is corrupted, and so it's signed with a private key. Therefore, there would be several ways to sign.

There would be the possibility of signing locally with a small clip, my command at night, Interfaith, which they have developed, which we can already use, even if yesterday the image is in the browser with meta masks. So the idea is to be able to bring a basic dimension to package signing and to be able to add, when delivering a package, an address and radiate to which people could directly donate to support open source. They call it a zero-configuration data SHON button for open source developers. So the idea is That they don't have to register on a platform so that we can donate directly without having to register somewhere or search for an address on some random profile deep in the internet, and that Terium might not even be the right one, that's it for Mist, for the Miss TV team. The three new features were announced when I was briefly talking to you about two Pantheons, one from Dawson who came to talk about Pantheon 1.

0, so that's the new release, and Pantheon. As a reminder, Pantheon is an internal client, that's only part of what Pegasys Mille does. I'm not just going to talk about the client, it's a recent client that came out in 2008, written in Java, and so, during the debt, as I believe Iliad announced, the synchronization of the net mail that had been done, meaning that the client was really alive, could be used to synchronize the net mail, and that's Pegasys's goal, if I'm not mistaken, is to develop a client that will be used by companies, to be the client The future client wasn't talking about businesses. Version 1.0, which was presented during the help session, was indeed a more business-oriented version that will be announced.

Support for a new album, Consensus Imev, which is version 2.0, was introduced by Corum. There's an explanation and a very detailed post on the Pegasis blog. We invite you to read it if this kind of news interests us. They also talked about all the features of Ning permissions, which mainly have two types of permissions: Ding and Acorn permissions.

Ning allows control over who likes transactions on the network. So here we're talking about two Consortia chain blocks for freedom and for the Cioni permit. So the private Unis host, so the country sending on the missions of the transactions, and the node permit schoening, which allows filtering new entrants on the network at the nose. There were also some technical improvements on synchronization, block processing, and the scope of Toulouse. Very good.

So that was version 1.0. That's the one that was released. realized that we can use it today, from neck to back. We also talked about the future, and therefore version 1.

1, where the face inc would be supported. If I understood correctly, they are considering it with the teams to add this feature and no longer just make it a synchronization in arcade mode. We checked, tell me if I'm wrong, they will integrate privacy solutions similar to those implemented on Quorum, but apparently a little more detailed. They are partnered with the web, Souilah Ben, on that, and there would be a shift of the permissioning solutions I mentioned earlier in China, so via smart contracts, version 2.0, we have, and 2019, plus there would be support for new consensus locations.

So there are ten who are working, it will be with several companies that would have details of different networks for that, allowing us to see a little bit of everything that is being done. He will want to watch this channel, which has added features to support it, to be unearthed, men 2.0, and there will be rail features too. I don't know which advanced ones, and in the long term, and for everything that erases serenity, the vision of robes during this presentation is that all the companies that today have the knots of consortia between them would eventually move to the internet, still with some kind of consortium, but which would be plo Guer at the controls, which will run in the background, but everyone still rallied to this email. My understanding is that he was talking about this channel and the other one about the underlying privacy figures, and there you go, he addressed points that went beyond the roadmap, but we'll see, it was very interesting.

You can find the little diagram and other explanations online, and I'll hand it over to Délir. It's you, hello. So I wanted to talk to you a little about the part about the power plants for the fans, which was a leaflet during the bench is here, and on which there was a lot of stock, so a lot of repetition, so that's perhaps a good sign because there are also many things that are starting to mature, that are starting to become clear between the different speakers. So firstly, these few rates that were generally on, what are the stakes today of the aggregation of financial securities? One thing that appears clear is that there is an inevitable phenomenon, we already have the digitization of financial securities, that's been going on for a long time, but by talking on the radio we can hear different things, but sometimes it's In the literal sense, putting them on a good chain like elsewhere, but there are also a variety of movements, such as the obligation to gradually open APIs for banks.

So there's this general idea of ​​creating open, standardized, interoperable systems, etc. The most obvious expected benefit, the one that comes up all the time, is better settlement/delivery efficiency. This is the whole part when you buy a security. Afterwards, to be truly certain, the movement of securities today is quite complicated, and so we hope to gain from this. But perhaps of all the benefits, the most obvious one is that it will certainly gain speed and reduce costs.

It's perhaps also the least disruptive one ultimately because it's just an optimization of existing processes. There are potential opportunities in the primary market, but that's the whole question of SME financing. By creating, for example, new categories of needs, can we finance them? And that's the big problem we have today in Europe; SMEs are often not very It's still clear today, so there's interest from many players working on this and starting to try to support SMEs. Media, care, selection bias—it's hard to find good SMEs with sufficiently mature projects that are also interested in experimental projects.

There's a bit of a double difficulty in parallel. Among the benefits, there's more transparency for regulators and buyers. So, it's imagining that the stock becomes a bit more complete in its information, both to understand what's happening in the market and to understand what the stock is really linked to. We saw with the financial crisis that this was a real problem, and this could solve this type of issue. There are two techniques: the question of liquidity—being able to have a stock that can no longer be easily traded—and fractional ownership.

So, imagine that you have a stock and that you can buy a portion of it. So, for example, for real estate assets, there's the project of [unclear - possibly "like a peach"] which, obviously, is a type of asset that... It's interesting because it's quite stable compared to other assets, but the initial investment is far too high for most people. Then there's the question of whether it opens up more opportunities for international exposure, so these small-scale investments, like those of an SME, and then suddenly we can trade them on global markets. It's interesting a priori, and socially, so that's a hope.

Could it allow wealthy individuals or other social groups to access certain types of assets that they currently can't access, either due to constraints (as I mentioned, two barriers to entry), or because of a minimum investment? But it can also be good simply because the information is accessible, because it goes through somewhat complicated processes. So, some potential uses have been mentioned, notably by the six colonists. There are some interesting uses, such as green finance and Islamic finance, which generally require avoiding loans. So, how does it work?

Based on these assets, it can allow for interesting structures, as Puidoux said. SME financing: there are a whole series of projects underway, so I have n't listed them all. Indeed, if we put the list together, if we put all the presentations end to end, they always conclude with the ongoing projects. But we know that ongoing projects... an interesting fact was that Malta hired developers from the Society to work seriously on these issues.

Then there were two talks that specifically addressed the standard, around 1400, by two of its initiators: Adam and Stéphane Gosselin. What you need to understand is that the starting point of RC Media Time is to say we need a common standard to define security. This would allow for the real functioning of markets because it's pointless for everyone to digitize a token if they aren't open and interoperable, even on their own blog. Chesnais Terium won't go very far in terms of the expected benefits. It's a bit like facilitating entry for players once a standard is clear, allowing a new player to say, "Here's how I define my new securities."

Financiers today, everyone is kind of reinventing the wheel on how they tinker with this. There's a lot of knowledge that needs to be reacquired, and it's not actually very difficult at heart, but it's a small bridge to bridge. And then to reassure the regulators, we can say that once there's a clear standard, it will be easier for the regulators to say, "Okay, we can adopt this standard." So, there have been several conversations about this standard. It started during Boxing Week, even before that.

Online, there's a GitHub, a Telegram channel about it, a whole section of the Wizard of Oz group that's also thinking about it with various meetings. Then, this girls' race was also an opportunity to discuss all of this again. It was well done to be gathered for half- days. It also allows us to exchange ideas on these issues. The difficulty is first and foremost the proximity.

So today, defining a standard on is and at Homs is generally difficult. I'm seeing the page of the 6400 era. To understand, their 6400 no longer exists. There were 1410s and 1411s since then. In fact, we realized it wasn't working very well, so now there are about forty.

So, actually, it's 1410, not today. Maybe it's stabilizing around 5.6, a standard that seems roughly adapted and corresponds to different needs, but clearly puts the initial enthusiasm a bit of a flop there on the left, if it's present, and Adam of that on the wings were the elements of the near, so one of the elements is the rough, like US sauce, so we tried to reach an agreement with difficulty. There are gaps in there, so another difficulty is the question of, in fact, it's often seen with an American perspective with a certain type of titles in mind. When we arrive in Europe, we realize that it has still fragmented with different titles per country, each time ears in each country, dozens of categories, so in fact there are A real problem lies in the veil of reality surrounding financial securities today, which are far too complex to easily attempt standardization.

Saying it's impossible means it requires effort, particularly in terms of coordination and analysis. This is a topic that has come up frequently, so we've reached the conclusion that we should set up a working group on this. We already have an initial document on this, but it's proving difficult. Something close to my heart is also looking beyond just the ecosystem. Having a perfect standard isn't enough; we really need to consider how this survey works within the rest of the financial ecosystem.

This leads me to the challenge. I really enjoyed Justin Anne's presentation. He worked on the representation of financial securities, partly through employee transmission, and he had a tone that was somewhat... well, it didn't work very well as a first approach, and we're trying again from time to time before a new one. I think it's quite nice to have a very honest and...

It's not about marking sounds produced by crutches, but about showing the difficulties encountered. So, first, the technical difficulties, and that will make the transition to the next point. The question of confidentiality is obvious; most of the time, when transferring financial securities, there are many stakeholders who want confidentiality for these transfers. Then there's portfolio management. When you have a fund here that has to manage a certain number of shares and with different employees, etc.

, you have to be able to manage rights and manage the portfolio. I won't say there's a key, which is the ledger. And the question of legacy systems—how does it integrate with existing systems? Because that's already the problem today in banks; it's a stack of different infrastructures. So, if you add a new one, you have to think about starting to connect with it, and today, intermediate software is scarce.

The question of the security's lifecycle—that is to say, we reason a lot when we were talking about the standard. A lot of reasoning was based on the assumption that when transferring, what are the transfer rules? Do you have to go through... An administrative authority is what there was authorization to see etc., but there's also v2, the life of using it, for example, when I have voting rights attached to this security, how do I use them now that I have this security, how are the dividends sent, which I am perhaps not just 2, just having the collection via the blockchain blocks with the user, you also have to have perhaps a way to finance, to pay, and the question of sustainability, so we see that it's still a technology that evolves very quickly, which again I did a workshop Tuesday afternoon, or in the afternoon, the version of the one that said they had changed, latest version, a little confusion, it's really a long-term problem as such, what is the prospect of this technology, and today none of the big players will really be able to invest in it if we don't have a five- to ten-year project, a fund that will arrive in five to ten years, I think nobody here has a clear idea of ​​what will happen to them It was posted in five to ten years, so it might be funny to have a mindset that hasn't adapted at all to be able to have financiers.

We won't be able to say in two years in Toulon, finally we're going to change techniques, and then in the end, change jobs, updating everything that isn't possible. Then there are questions towards institutional investors, not technical ones, questions of investor demand, and the question of demand, for example, from employees. When we offer shares via a blockchain to Maes employees who are interested in the voice in this form, do they find it amusing? Is it practical for them? Today, it's not very impressive, actually, the demand for it, because, well, the benefits would only exist once there is a large ecosystem to spread, to do things with my title, to lie to be able to borrow.

Finally, we can imagine that there are many interesting things to do, but as long as it doesn't exist, for now, it's at +1, 1 additional point, which embodies for everyone this question of the US-European vision often intervenes in this. The ecosystem raises the question of market players, so who will introduce these standards? And then, regarding this practice, will it be startups jumping on board, or will it be the major players who will shift the system? All the major players, as I've discussed, are currently considering developing a project, etc., but they are often quite isolated in their business strategy, so it's still not very clear who will be the one to shift it.

It was only the system that was affected. The question of inevitable legal costs then arises, including Justin's presentation, which showed that there are unavoidable legal costs. At this point, we work with students, especially if we want to work in different territories. And then there's the question of providing human services. I found that interesting, but just because it's a financial security doesn't mean we're suddenly in a cold, technical world.

In fact, today, while there are many people who are well-paid and banks, are there also human beings who can respond to the... Phone companies that sell products, reassure investors, or explain details about a product generally need a real, competent human service that meets the needs of the other party. Even if it's a bank, they also need people to talk to; it's not just about having a technical platform. That was all for me, thank you Xavier. So, I wanted to talk to you about a final presentation on vulnerability hunting.

We could also have included it in the AP hunting section because it's the most popular application in that area right now, but Cardas, where there was a myth-up very recently, so I won't go over the whole explanation again, but in a few sentences, what is it? In Canada, it's a system that allows its users to generate a Steibel-Coyne style 'stable' token called the Thai, whose value is pegged to the dollar, so one die equals one dollar, by opening debt positions. With collateral, for now we can only put them as collateral, and when I put a lot of land, the game can generate a bit of size. If the value of ether falls, I'll be liquidated, and we'll resell the currency on the market to repay my debt. So it's very widely used.

There's 2% of the value of all the Ether, and its look, which is locked in its smart contracts. Right now, there are 88 million dollars in Ether circulating on the market, and it's being used more and more simply as currency. For me, I bought my LFC ticket in Hendaye. It was convenient; there was a small discount. So what was interesting here was the European business developer of MakerDiao, who gave us a short presentation.

He went back over the basics of MakerDiao, so that interested me a little less. We're starting to get to know those who are interested in the ecosystem. However, there's a large Q&A section at the end where we learned some interesting things. For me, that's what... What interested me was that this year, in 2019, we're moving to a second version of Mesquer Diao with multi-collateral CTPs, so positions of PTs where we can hold not just tokens, but all sorts of tokens.

And then, depending on the security we have on the token's value, the ratios we can use to generate DIEs will change. They've learned a lot with the current implementation of this SPL. For example, right now the DIE is struggling to maintain its peg to the dollar; it's hovering around 0.96 cents. So they're holding a lot of votes at the DNA level, but the core issue is increasing the interest rate on the credit so that people can close debt positions and bring the DIE back to the value of one dollar.

They've learned a lot about governance from this, which they'll improve in version 2. Just by holding DIEs, we'll have a Diving Wright, so a savings rate on the DIEs when we have our DIEs. will get 2% interest every year, so this will force people to hold more of the die and help them maintain the peg. So how will this migration work? It will happen to everyone who has current die, which we call S die, beautiful single collateral, small size, their income, their bonds, will be able to transfer them to a smart contract that will be bound by Sedai version 1 and their masters of die version 2.

If you have positions of Psalms and Heart, there will be a migration tool available that will do everything automatically. That's convenient, and they are working on it. They tell us that it will arrive soon on euros of garlic and hyenas die, which will therefore be pegged to the value of other currencies, so very interesting. Other people asked questions: could I put medal to open a position to generate even more die? They said no, but on the other hand, you could collateralize euro die to generate EU SD dice, which would allow you to take long positions on the value USB against the euro or things like that, I don't see the point.

Maybe more sophisticated players are focusing on it, and they're concentrating a lot, a lot. Ultimately, why are they doing multi- collateral? Leading multi- collateral positions? Because they want to open up to more exotic tokens. So they want to open up to the entire security token ecosystem and would like people to be able to generate, for example, a counter to their shares in a real estate fund, their share of a building, their share of a bond, or a stock.

This would allow them to generate even more counters by attaching them to all this value that exists in the financial asset ecosystem. So they're working a lot with regulators on these aspects, which would allow them to reach counter valuations of several billion. So it was very interesting. On the other hand, for other applications, explorers, etc., we had a very interesting presentation from Dr.

Vincent Elie, who now works at [company name missing], who wears a mask and is working on how to use this thin client that we use. As a Chrome extension to access Layer 2, and to work on aspects such as privacy, they asked themselves how to use a meta mask to do more than simple transactions or simple interactions with Layer 1 applications. As their thinking progressed, they created a whole framework within Meet to mask and better interact with applications. You can find them by searching for "uip" and "17.55" on Google, or you can read about what's being done on this and even comment on it, because it's still work in progress.

What has come out of it is the use of application keys. ions d' appliquer chains qu'ils donc c'est quoi qui intéresse Vitalic qui est 48 et participe à la sujet donc la problème qui n'a n'a pas s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s'il s' s'il s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' s' 's' ... Every time I interact on a page and click buttons, I won't get the metamask pop-up asking me to approve it each time. It would happen automatically, and I wouldn't have to wait for something to be mined to get the next one. Sometimes there are certain steps in smart contracts that require approval for five consecutive transactions, which is very annoying for the user experience.

So this would streamline things. There are some small examples in the bottom right of what we could do with it. We could have counters that only allow the use of one token per account per application. We simply want to do cryptographic signatures with metamasks, but we don't want to exchange value. So many new uses for metamasks could be considered if we adopt this IP.

[Music] Then there's a lot of talk about privacy. One that caught my attention is the Aztec Jean Castex Protocol. It's a startup that's been getting a lot of buzz lately. She created a protocol to allow private transactions on the Roanne network, using knowledge proof zeros, ICs, and snacks. This allows for the confidentiality of the value and sender of transactions.

For this, they use a system very similar to what is done on ZCache. They called it the Lah Jones transaction layer. Each transaction includes all the incoming transactions, which are shuffled a little and then redistributed to all the recipients of these transactions. A knowledge proof zero is used to prove that there was as much value in the input as in the output and that nothing was lost or pocketed in the process. They also created a confidential token standard with this, which they call RC 1724.

This is somewhat of an extinction of Hershey VIN, which is compatible with everything that is compatible with RC VIN. It is also compatible with confidential EYDAP tokens that use their protocols. And they have... Published in their grid for Guillaume, an example of 0 knowledge size, so a Steeple Coyne, the daily equal to $1, but which can be exchanged confidentially, so it's very interesting. Here we're getting closer to the functionalities of cash, simply liquid money.

We have money, a currency with a stable value that we can use confidentially. So we're finally getting closer to a digital currency that could replace cash. And they plan in the third quarter of 2 published and to put into production wallets, 0 knowledge wallets that will allow for native confidential transactions. Today we know that as soon as we do complex things like insurance, it costs a lot of gas. So today each simple confidential transaction is 900,000 gas.

They have proposed to help the IP, which should be implemented, which should be able to reduce its 200,000 gas in the coming days. The next dates were a few tocs. Then on the user experience, we know that it's really one of the points to improve. There's the The founder of Maille Crypto Taylor Monahan Café had an interesting quirk: she focused more on identifying the problem than offering solutions, but it's still interesting to observe the problem. All these screenshots I've included here show her explaining the forty-six steps a new user has to take to use an application in the field when they know nothing about it.

So, completely naive, they say, "Yes, I'm going to use an exchange." They use it for the first time, and then they're told, " No, I have to go get some tokens." So they have to register on an exchange. They're told they have to send their ID, and so on. They have to approve all of that.

"Be careful, you want a lot of tokens, so you need a hardware wallet." They have to order it, receive it, and then, once they get around to using it, they update it. Then, they lose their keys, so they update them again. We're already at step 20. Then, when I finally want to press a button on my application, I'm told, "Be careful, a transaction costs gas, and you don't have enough."

So, I have to go back to the exchanges. buy them back and so on, and finally, at the end of step 46, I do them, but in fact, there's only one percent left of the visits and users who got that far. She compares this with small testimonials on forums or in articles on the internet, with a 2.93 rating. She then explains that interoperability is necessary; everything needs to be connected in a way that's also transparent.

She then moves on to a Mile Crypto v2 that helps with this, but there aren't many solutions offered. We hope we'll improve on these steps and get to fewer than five steps. We should be able to approach our grandparents. Something that also impressed me is a C1 wallet; it's the silver wallet, which is a very well-chosen name, a nickname in France, Kiki, which implements quite a few futures, which I find very practical. To make these types of wallets more popular, they are inspired by N26 of Revo Lu Tu to improve their user experience, so they produce a wallet and Argent Connect allows you to connect to the platform, which they don't want to do with web browsers.

They just want to connect to the platform, so they don't have a way to restore the wallet. It doesn't require writing a 12MB key on a piece of paper to back up your wallet. They find that too complicated for the average person. So what they propose is something more similar to what you would do in traditional wallets, etc. It's about appointing guardians for your wallet.

You can name Argent as a guardian, or you can name friends who have the app. This means that if I lose my phone or access to my app, I can ask three guardians to simply press a button to say, "Yes, I'm playing, I want to restore the wallet." This allows you to restore your wallet if you lose it. So it's much more intuitive and practical. Instead of writing a key on a piece of paper and putting it in a safe at the bank, it integrates addresses, meaning names, which is much easier.

to use, and they provide you with one for free when you install the application. So it's an address, your name for money, dot x y z cij, and if my memory serves me right, there's one of the exchange centers directly integrated into it that allows you to change this open directly in the wallet. You can also set authorization levels on your wallet, like a daily limit on what you can exchange or what you can send. This means that if someone steals my phone, they won't be able to steal more than one euro, for example. Or if you want to transfer more than 10 euros, it requires authorization from one of your guardians.

You can say, "Yes, I can send this address a lot of money, but no, I can't send more than one euro per day to any unknown address." They gave us a small demo that you can access, but you can't do much because you need the application, which isn't released yet, to use it. But it's definitely FCC Points Paris, where they showed us how they both plan to connect their current time to the applications. Decentralized, so they're taking a different approach from web browsers. 3D browsers don't want us to use their browser to access the application; they want up to 1 classic browsers like Chrome OS, true taste, etc.

, to be able to easily access the time the money was going. So he shows us an example: you can check in to the conference easily. So we go to the site, we press a button, I scan a QR code with the Money app, and then the application is mine, or the LEDs are connected, and then I can interact with all the buttons, and the permissions are done directly in the background, and we no longer have to switch from the browser to me using the Vermont Wallet browser. Everything is done seamlessly after the first association of the two, so it was interesting. In the future, he wants to directly integrate a ramp that allows switching from fiat to crystals, so from euros to tokens, to integrate with standards or using collection and universal logins.

What I haven't mentioned, which is also very interesting, is that they pay for your gas for all your first transactions, I think. Up to twenty transactions, and they pay for your gas because they're integrated with a gas station network relay. This means that as soon as you initiate a transaction, someone offers to pay for it for you. Those who are currently funding it hope that all the applications that integrate with it will also finance all that gas, so it also helps the user experience. You pay more for gas when you make transactions, and they also want to integrate pricing features.

Yes, the application was released, okay, I said in April on Android, so these are releases on iOS, and it should be released probably in April. South games for Android, so you can test it. All those of you who have an iPhone, go to FCC Points Paris and test their demos to link it to your wallet. Yes, someone who stole the show at all the recent conferences is Austin Collie Jr., who is a very, very good speaker, a very good developer who releases a product every month.

So his application, the one that's currently very successful, is Port Nord, where it originated. He created it thinking, "But how do I..." He wanted to make cryptocurrency widely adopted in the East and in developing countries, so he wanted it to be very easily accessible and user-friendly. He created a wallet called the Bernard Wallet, accessible from any device, any browser, mobile phone, or laptop. If you go to the address x die dot you, you can access it.

It's a wallet we use temporarily; we don't put more money in it than we would keep in our pocket. Often, it holds no more than $50 or €50. We use it, for example, for a week or for a single event, to make transactions quickly. We use the stablecoin, like the one in Die, but we transfer it to a single chain that proves its authority at the consensus level. So it's less secure than the Mansion and slower for small amounts, but it's sufficient.

This chain allows transactions in less than 5 seconds, so it's very fast for paying for things. The Apple website, Apple Daily, is strange, even transformed into x d'ail, and this x Die allows for very easy exchange, so he worked extensively on the user interface of his wallet. It's very easy to exchange value or send a QR code directly to WhatsApp, which, as soon as the person scans it, generates a pre-filled wallet. He also works with Metatron Actions and Cast Network, which allows you to pay for your first gas transactions. You create your wallet, so people aren't lost when they create a wallet and can't do anything with it because they don't have gas to pay for.

So it's very, very easy. They used it for the first time on a large scale at the F Dender event, where all the food and drinks on-site for three days were payable only in X of Garlic. With this wallet, it worked very well. They managed to approach all the food trucks that were there easily; everyone paid with X of Die. They had a small, slightly scary, LED-shaped device with a code that was distributed at the entrance.

They just had to scan it. Bam, we gave them a wallet with $20 on it, then they paid at the food trucks with that. So the moral of the story is that there were 4,400 meals we were paid for with that, and the total transaction fees were only 20 cents, especially for the event. Whereas if we had used Visa or Mastercard, it would have been $700. So it's a good way to convince people, especially the merchants, who were happy to save those $700.

It was used during the event, also during one of the evening events. I wasn't there, so I can't tell you my experience, but I got a lot of feedback. So there too, we gave a QR code at the entrance with a message; you just had to scan it to get a pre-filled wallet, and you could pay for your drinks all evening. What's really interesting is that I posted some little tweets there. Julien Boot looks, who organized the event, totally He forgot a garbage bag full of wallets at the party, so he lost everything, almost $1000 that he had left in his wallets.

One of our colleagues, I don't know if he's here, Sylvain, was very clever and was there during the party collecting all the bits and pieces that people had left behind, and he made us a little script—I didn't put the address here, but he'll share it with you—that allowed him to swipe and retrieve the leftovers. He made 20 euros with it. He's very happy, and so he really lived up to his reputation as a crypto enthusiast, as they like to call themselves. But this gave Austin Griffiths some ideas. He thought maybe pre-filled wallets would work, so that at the end of each party we lose a lot of cents when people throw away their papers.

And everyone, Fred, made wallets that are filled by... relays that when we scan them, which means that all the papers that haven't been used aren't filled out, so if we forget them it's not a big deal, there's nothing on them, we don't lose money. So this allowed him to give feedback on this usage, and so we have a very last moment to talk about the future. Men were Roma 2.0, and I don't remember who was talking about it.

We're approaching, it was very fast. I'm not going to talk about the talk itself at all because it's more of an excuse to talk about the 2.0 term in two minutes since the rate was just the presentation. Our clients, Salinity, with specific security futures, this is just to give a quick update for those who aren't yet aware of the roadmap, which has indeed changed a lot in the last two years regarding development. It deteriorates in the future.

So after the changes on the channel that exists today, so contrary to what was initially planned on TMC, the main Deuterium channel that exists today will never be broadcast in Provence and which will never evolve on the worthy chariot, but we have moved on to an evolution with the creation of new chains, and in particular, so it is an evolution that will take place in several stages, facing 0, facing a 13-2, with different stages of development that will ultimately lead, if all goes well, to realizing the initial vision. So, that is to say, a global computer that allows for the execution of an enormous amount of work per second and which constitutes a kind of global state of decentralized applications. So, read three phases of development. The first is already relatively advanced; it is the FA0, which we call Baconsch, the beacon, life as Chase, and the implementation of the famous proof of state. So, the transition from proof of work with mining as we know it today would be like an Apple could translate as proof of stake, which we have at 3.

10 per, coming from shoes, were Roma France. In any case, so, Miss Financier in cryptocurrency to secure the chain, so, as I was saying, instead of being implemented on the main chain as it exists today, we will create a A new pick-and- chain will be created solely to activate the steak provocation. We'll also add functions to finalize the main chain, linking these two new chains to Terium 1.0 to act as two security beacons. These beacons prevent chain rollbacks because they've been finalized.

There will be support for the chain states that have been finalized thanks to the Biguine Chain and this beacon chain. The effect will be to activate a photocall for the poor at the steak. Normally, all the apps will be there, along with the entire implementation of the Casper FFG steak provocation. This includes the Vitali Koval version, which triggers stakes with slashing, family slashing, and block finalizations via steak. There will be a minimum steak requirement, a minimum financial investment to participate, which has been set for now.

It's true that this shouldn't change; it will be a minimum of 32 hectares that will need to be deposited. Participating in securing the chain is rewarded for this. The transition will involve putting a smart contract on the existing terium chain and r, which will be replicated on the new beacon chain. So, using ter tickets, meaning cloned terrestrial debits, and with its monetary beats, we will secure the chain and receive in exchange other countries will know, knowing that it's a one-way operation, the AMT is a single-source operation, so we won't go back to transform the pampered terrestrial ones into es, so it's a bit of a "however" for the terrestrial ones. That's because, obviously, if phase 1 and phase 2 don't work, the authors are lost.

So, we have phase 1, which will be the "chars ding" phase, and "chardy good," meaning the explosion, or rather the creation, of a very large number of "hate" strains that will be anchored on the Big and Chain and which are chains of states, of " deschênes," yes, that's it, heads of state. So the idea is only to record states, but there won't be any transaction execution on the "avifauna" chain. Look, it's only the data. The execution engine won't be ready at that point. In any case, it will be done in a later phase, which is phase 2.

So, it contains the data, but there's no execution engine for that. So, there are still possible uses for certain functionalities, but it wo n't be a chain like the "chesnaie terium" that exists today. That is to say, it can execute even the "contractors." Transactions will not be able to perform transactions, for example, during phase 1, and it is only in phase 2 that the virtual machine that allows transactions to be executed, and therefore the state of the correct host chain to be modified automatically with Mountain Chain, is implemented. In fact, version 2.

0 is implemented, so with a priori a transition of the virtual machine and RMT Kleis (today IBM) to Higuain, which is a new standard, but it is an adaptation of a machine standard that should normally be more efficient, less expensive, and perhaps allow easier use of more neutral, more common languages ​​than solid tools for developing smartphones. The relevance of doing this remains to be studied. So, obviously, this is not for right now. We are actually planning for base 0, if all goes well, at the end of this year or the beginning of next year. Phase 1 will follow, then the following year.

So, we will have to be patient, knowing that during this whole period we can still continue to use version 3.0, which should have undergone significant improvements in the meantime. Since there was Rome or Annexes, which is a sort of transitional version also in parallel development, there's a series of improvements to the existing channel that should allow us to wait patiently until the completion of phase 2. All of this is, of course, still very tentative and subject to the vagaries of development with this external art. And that was for a very quick presentation of the Villepin interim state today.

So, to conclude this short summary of the CC, we've included many links. As usual, for all members of the sect, we'll share the presentation on the CET Slack channel. There's a Fred-like group where someone very kindly and freely provided us with a list of all the videos with links to all the names and everything. So it's very convenient for finding them rather than going directly to the CET YouTube account. So I advise you to go there if one of the presentations interests you or you want to know more.

There's also a report, a summary of what was done. During the meeting, the magician, just before the CCFF magician CCD meeting of all stakeholders interested in governance, unearthed a man and his future. So often we organize debates on several subjects, and this allows us to define directions on several subjects. It deteriorates, so it's very interesting. And if you ever happen to go to a city where this takes place, it's open to everyone.

There's the Winehouse Park recap of the event, which is interesting to see. The recap, not that it was crucial, and Vidal's, Free Kick, and especially focused on "Man 2.0." A7 wanted to thank Talent for hosting us today for this meetup. All the FCC sponsors you see here, lots of things we have n't talked about.

HTC presented its portable blockchain, its smartphone blockchain. No, I have nothing to say about it because I'm still not convinced of what Opera is for. On the other hand, that's very good; it's the mobile browser that does Web 3 browsing. Now we can navigate on steps. And there's an oil inside, and lots of...

I'm not going to talk about all the topics, and lots of other sponsors, and we were supported by the CNAM Foundation, which hosted us, and lots of other companies and media outlets, and of course all the volunteers who wore Ash Ketchum's hat from Pokémon there were very helpful. We didn't include photos, but Scott, who was here, and Bettina were the two main organizers of the event and made it a super well-organized event whose quality and content everyone appreciated. A lot of people from the whole community were there, lots of evenings every night, it was super interesting. So we talked about the topics we saw that interested us. If we wanted to do everything, it would take almost eighteen days of content during this conference if we put it all online, so it was very complicated.

But just before concluding, I suggest that if you have any questions about things you heard about, we can see if we can answer them, or if you heard about them, or if you were present, about two topics that... that we may have forgotten and that you found very interesting or new that may have come out, we can pass around a microphone just to open this recap to everyone present here, so does anyone have any questions or comments on M6? And there's Thibaut Favrot who discussed the concept of continuing this port, capable of continuing this aspect of racing, which seemed interesting to me. Would you like to hear more on that? He's making progress; he's already developed a first version, and in fact, he 's really trying to...

So, for those who haven't followed, when you don't organize yourself and are active on the flop, it's someone who works, and previously worked in civic tech, building different types of projects, a bit like that, and his idea is to try to make a 2D form for Ho Chi Minh City that allows for better risk and reward for the investor, for the employees who all join a startup project. In fact, he's seen a lot of projects emerge, and he's trying to improve his latest conversation. I was with him in the race, and he had a team. He'd found a first prototype, and it's progressing well, so there you go. But for the details, listen, this is just to fill in the gaps.

Yeah, so it's called "Continue on Organization by Thibault." These farms are internal, otherwise, from the company he set up within the framework of Family. There are other similar token implementations based on linker benches, in particular another project called Appian Way. I don't know if some people know it, which is in the Arab world. So they're also on the ground.

Man and at the same time, his associates are on the team in Water Network, if I'm not mistaken. I know very little about " Continue on Organization Chain," but it's a model that consists of somewhat releasing the token, but as the project progresses and delivers products, to avoid giving millions of dollars to a team that no longer has any incentive to work because they obtained everything with complete freedom to use it from the beginning. So these are models that read A little bit about the use and unlocking of funds to better facilitate the development of a product. Do we have any other questions or other brands? There's a topic I really like: universal logging and honess.

It's good. I tried to follow the TOC a little bit, but are there people who could talk about it too? So, does anyone feel like talking about it? I only remember the TOC from Defcon, so even then... and this will just be an introduction, so I suppose you already know, but universal logging would consist of developing a standard that would allow people to have a unique profile to access...

that's useful. It will also use the principle of two meta-transactions, something very similar to the applications they conveyed with metamasks that will derive unique keys for the use of each application and that would allow, using money, also the transaction methods and gas relays, to stream a lot of... and the user interface step was that we arrive on a date to be able to directly... We register to generate keys just for that date, which we can then use again, and at least make all the initial transactions without paying any fees until we've thoroughly tested the application. Then we start learning about transaction fees, how to properly back up our wallets, and this universal system would allow us to have a profile we could reuse.

We could also grant specific permissions depending on the application, and for example, store documents in a decentralized manner (like ENAP). We would n't have to repeat the entire Quesnoy process here for applications, but simply say, "Yes, I'm happy to share my identity again." What information would be shared with this application, etc. So, these are standards that are being developed, and if adopted, they would greatly simplify the user experience of all these applications. This is the NSRS; it's about being able to auction and obtain a domain name that we can then associate with an address.

So, for example, your first and last name. And then most wallets have integrated this domain standard, so if you type my first name, not just "th," you can directly send me ether. It's linked to an address, and it greatly simplifies exchanging transactions because let's not kid ourselves, when you give someone an exact address, it scares them. Someone who doesn't know the domain is scared, and if I make a mistake with a character, if it's an uppercase or lowercase letter, especially since Rome did n't implement something like Bitcoin, which proves that it's a valid address, it scares people. And once this standard is adopted, it will allow for easy exchange of transactions.

Does anyone have a final remark or question? There's a big hunger for it. There's a small difference, by the way. I advise you to go see the top lists of Alex van de Sande; he's the one behind Universal Login. Given in any case, here's the deal, another hiccup at the defcon, no, I went there, you do there, a little one, he did it to be Denver too, and he made a stop in Paris which was the haka, your after, and so he wants, there are quite a few things to look at, and in fact, one of the things about Universal Login is that the private keys are never displayed, but they are mainly stored locally, so you don't see your private keys, nobody is born to control your private keys, what happens is that, for example, if I lose the Universal Games on my phone, everything is done on my phone and the private keys stay on my phone, and that's it, so what that also means is that if I lose my phone, I lose the private key, and so for that, well, there are lots and lots of techniques, which he talks about at length in this water, so I advise you to go and see, thank you